SOCIO-CHEMICAL DETERMINANTS OF PUBLIC PERCEPTION AND BEHAVIOURAL RESPONSE TO ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION IN INDUSTRIAL COMMUNITIES
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Industrial pollution presents serious health and environmental risks, but public perception and behavioural responses to these hazards are shaped by a complex interplay of chemical realities and social factors. This interdisciplinary mini review explores how sensory experiences, cognitive biases, institutional trust, environmental stigma, and sociodemographic characteristics influence how industrial communities perceive pollution and take action. Sensory cues such as odours and visible emissions often play a dominant role in shaping awareness, sometimes overshadowing scientific measurements. Psychological biases, including feelings of personal invulnerability and the tendency to view one’s immediate environment as safer than it objectively is, can distort risk perceptions and hinder protective behaviours. Institutional trust is a critical determinant of public engagement; when trust in authorities and regulators is low, skepticism and social activism increase, while transparent communication fosters cooperation. Environmental stigma can deeply affect community identity and wellbeing, leading to avoidance behaviours and social withdrawal even amid remediation efforts. Sociodemographic factors such as gender, income, education, and proximity to pollution sources—moderate risk perception and responses across diverse populations. Participatory monitoring initiatives that engage residents in data collection have shown promise in bridging the gap between subjective perceptions and objective environmental data, enhancing awareness and empowering communities. By integrating insights from both chemical and social sciences, this review highlights the importance of holistic, cross-disciplinary approaches for managing industrial pollution and supporting resilient, informed communities.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
[1] Nkwor, A. N., Iroroh, C. E., Ikhuoria, E. U., et al. (2025). Adsorptive treatment of paint effluent using zinc oxide nanoparticles synthesized from plantain peel extract: A green chemistry approach. In TMS 2025 154th Annual Meeting & Exhibition Supplemental Proceedings. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-80748-0_87.
[2] Onaiwu, G. E., & Ifijen, I. H. (2024). PM₂.₅-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs): Quantification and source prediction studies in the ambient air of automobile workshop using the molecular diagnostic ratio. Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment, 18(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44273-024-00027-y.
[3] Ikhuoria, E. U., Okoduwa, T., Ifijen, I. H., et al. (2025). Sustainable treatment of industrial paint effluent using calcium oxide nanoparticles derived from waste snail (Archachatina marginata) shells. In TMS 2025 154th Annual Meeting & Exhibition Supplemental Proceedings (pp. [insert page numbers if available]). The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-80748-0_57.
[4] Ifijen, I. H. (2018). Remediation capacities of selected fibrous waste on crude oil contaminated soil. Journal of Energy Technologies and Policy, 8(2), 23–29. Retrieved from http://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JETP/article/view/42111.
[5] Oghoje, S. U., Omoruyi, C. I., Ojeomo, C., & others. (2023). Revolutionizing soil remediation: Harnessing the potential of chicken manure digestates for petroleum hydrocarbon contamination. Chemistry Africa, 6, 3175–3184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42250-023-00711-6.
[6] Ajayi, O., Olalusi, A. P., Olarenwaju, O. O., et al. (2024). Enhancing energy efficiency and mitigating environmental degradation through anaerobic co-digestion of palm oil mill effluent and solid residues. Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management, 28(9). https://doi.org/10.4314/jasem.v28i9.33.
[7] Johnston, J., & Cushing, L. (2020). Chemical Exposures, Health, and Environmental Justice in Communities Living on the Fenceline of Industry. Current Environmental Health Reports, 7, 48 - 57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-020-00263-8.
[8] Mastrantonio, R., Cofini, V., Tobia, L., Mastrangeli, G., Guerriero, P., Cipollone, C., & Fabiani, L. (2025). Assessing Occupational Chemical Risk Perception in Construction Workers: A Cross-Sectional Study. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083332.
[9] Yang, R., Zhang, M., & Zhang, Y. (2024). A system dynamics model based on ISM for risk perception in emergency by employees in chemical industrial parks. Scientific Reports, 14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-77445-z.
[10] Xue, W., Hine, D., Loi, N., Thorsteinsson, E., & Phillips, W. (2014). Cultural worldviews and environmental risk perceptions: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 249-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVP.2014.07.002.
[11] Zhang, Y., Dong, Z., Mao, Y., Huo, X., & Wu, L. (2025). Exploring Community Resilience: The Joint Roles of Environmental Knowledge and Risk Perception in Pro-Environmental Behavior. Buildings. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15020169.
[12] Subiza-Pérez, M., Santa-Marina, L., Irizar, A., Gallastegi, M., Anabitarte, A., Urbieta, N., Babarro, I., Molinuevo, A., Vozmediano, L., & Ibarluzea, J. (2019). What makes us feel the risk? Predicting risk perceptions of environmental exposures through socio-demographic and psycho-environmental variables. Environmental Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ee9.0000610308.33479.27.
[13] Olofsson, A., Öhman, S., & Nygren, K. (2016). An intersectional risk approach for environmental sociology. Environmental Sociology, 2, 346 - 354. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2016.1246086.
[14] Subiza-Pérez, M., Santa-Marina, L., Irizar, A., Gallastegi, M., Anabitarte, A., Urbieta, N., Babarro, I., Molinuevo, A., Vozmediano, L., & Ibarluzea, J. (2019). What makes us feel the risk? Predicting risk perceptions of environmental exposures through socio-demographic and psycho-environmental variables. Environmental Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ee9.0000610308.33479.27.
[15] Olofsson, A., Öhman, S., & Nygren, K. (2016). An intersectional risk approach for environmental sociology. Environmental Sociology, 2, 346 - 354. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2016.1246086.
[16] Zhang, Y., Dong, Z., Mao, Y., Huo, X., & Wu, L. (2025). Exploring Community Resilience: The Joint Roles of Environmental Knowledge and Risk Perception in Pro-Environmental Behavior. Buildings. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15020169.
[17] Ghio, D., Lawes-Wickwar, S., Tang, M., Epton, T., Howlett, N., Jenkinson, E., Stanescu, S., Westbrook, J., Kassianos, A., Watson, D., Sutherland, L., Stanulewicz, N., Guest, E., Scanlan, D., Carr, N., Chater, A., Hotham, S., Thorneloe, R., Armitage, C., Arden, M., Hart, J., Byrne-Davis, L., & Keyworth, C. (2021). What influences people’s responses to public health messages for managing risks and preventing infectious diseases? A rapid systematic review of the evidence and recommendations. BMJ Open, 11. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048750.
[18] Licciardone, J. (2000). Risk Communication and Public Health. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 321, 1026. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.321.7267.1026/A.
[19] Ngwenya, S., Mashau, N., Mudau, A., Mhlongo, S., & Traoré, A. (2024). Community Perceptions on Health Risks Associated with Toxic Chemical Pollutants in Kwekwe City, Zimbabwe: A Qualitative Study. Environmental Health Insights,
18. https://doi.org/10.1177/11786302241260487.
[20] Dettori, M., Pittaluga, P., Busonera, G., Gugliotta, C., Azara, A., Piana, A., Arghittu, A., & Castiglia, P. (2020). Environmental Risks Perception Among Citizens Living Near Industrial Plants: A Cross-Sectional Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134870.
[21] Kosteska, S., & Topuzovska-Latkovic, M. (2022). Evaluation and relation of determinants of risk perception in the resident population living near industrially contaminated sites. Archives of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3889/aph.2022.6066.
[22] Karki, K., Chaurel, A., Neupane, A., Parajuli, K., & Ghimire, R. (2023). Risk perception among residents living near industries in Godawari Municipality of Lalitpur, Nepal. Environmental Analysis, Health and Toxicology, 38. https://doi.org/10.5620/eaht.2023029.
[23] Shah, S. (2022). IMPACT OF INDUSTRIAL POLLUTION ON OUR SOCIETY. Pakistan Journal of Science. https://doi.org/10.57041/pjs.v73i1.646.
[24] Noël, C., Van Landschoot, L., Vanroelen, C., & Gadeyne, S. (2022). The public’s perceptions of air pollution: What’s in a name? Environmental Health Insights, 16, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/11786302221123563.
[25] Bahrami, Z., Sato, S., Yang, Z., Maiti, M., Kanawat, P., Umemura, T., Onishi, K., Terasaki, H., Nakayama, T., Matsumi, Y., & Ueda, K. (2024). The perception of air pollution and its health risk: a scoping review of measures and methods. Global Health Action, 17. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2024.2370100.
[26] Cori, L., Donzelli, G., Gorini, F., Bianchi, F., & Curzio, O. (2020). Risk Perception of Air Pollution: A Systematic Review Focused on Particulate Matter Exposure. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176424.
[27] Song, W., Kwan, M., & Huang, J. (2024). Assessment of air pollution and air quality perception mismatch using mobility-based real-time exposure. PLOS ONE, 19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294605.
[28] Song, W., Kwan, M., & Huang, J. (2024). Assessment of air pollution and air quality perception mismatch using mobility-based real-time exposure. PLOS ONE, 19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294605.
[29] Chiarini, B., D’Agostino, A., Marzano, E., & Regoli, A. (2020). The perception of air pollution and noise in urban environments: A subjective indicator across European countries.. Journal of environmental management, 263, 110272 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110272.
[30] Lin, T., Wang, S., Kung, Z., Su, Y., Chiueh, P., & Hsiao, T. (2023). Unmasking air quality: A novel image-based approach to align public perception with pollution levels.. Environment international, 181, 108289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2023.108289.
[31] Bahrami, Z., Sato, S., Yang, Z., Maiti, M., Kanawat, P., Umemura, T., Onishi, K., Terasaki, H., Nakayama, T., Matsumi, Y., & Ueda, K. (2024). The perception of air pollution and its health risk: a scoping review of measures and methods. Global Health Action, 17. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2024.2370100.
[32] Boso, À., Oltra, C., Álvarez, B., & others. (2025). Why do we misperceive air pollution? A scoping review of key judgmental biases. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 18, 447–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-024-01650-y.
[33] Pasetto, R., & Malini, G. (2022). Promoting Environmental Justice in contaminated areas by combining environmental public health and community theatre practices. Futures. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2022.103011.
[34] Wang, Y., Lu, L., Yabe, M., & Yuan, Y. (2023). The Impact of Institutional Trust and Environmental Attitudes on Preferences for Participation Method in Rural Household Waste Management. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University. https://doi.org/10.5109/6796264.
[35] Brown, P. (2022). Industrial Pollution, Social Trust, and Civic Engagement: A Nationwide Study of the Socioenvironmental Nature of Social Capital. Sociological Perspectives, 65, 869 - 892. https://doi.org/10.1177/07311214211067755.
[36] Zannakis, M., Wallin, A., & Johansson, L. (2015). Political Trust and Perceptions of the Quality of Institutional Arrangements – how do they influence the public's acceptance of environmental rules. Environmental Policy and Governance, 25, 424-438. https://doi.org/10.1002/EET.1676.
[37] Azam, M., & Liu, L. (2020). Impact of institutional quality on environment and energy consumption: evidence from developing world. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23, 1646 - 1667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00644-x.
[38] Li, X., Chen, W., Cundy, A., Chang, A., & Jiao, W. (2018). Analysis of influencing factors on public perception in contaminated site management: Simulation by structural equation modeling at four sites in China. Journal of environmental management, 210, 299-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.01.029.
[39] Akpan, U., & Kama, U. (2023). Does institutional quality really matter for environmental quality? Energy & Environment, 35, 4361 - 4385. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X231180702.
[40] Zhuang, J., Cox, J. G., Chung, M., Hamm, J. A., Zwickle, A., & Upham, B. L. (2019). Risk, stigma, trustworthiness, and citizen participation—A multifaceted analysis of media coverage of dioxin contamination in Midland, Michigan. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(21), 4165. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16214165.
[41] Sullivan, D., Schmitt, H., Calloway, E., Clausen, W., Tucker, P., Rayman, J., & Gerhardstein, B. (2021). Chronic environmental contamination: A narrative review of psychosocial health consequences, risk factors, and pathways to community resilience. Social science & medicine, 276, 113877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113877.
[42] Legg, R., Prior, J., Adams, J., & McIntyre, E. (2023). The relations between mental health and psychological wellbeing and living with environmental contamination: A systematic review and conceptual framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.101994.
[43] Edelstein, M. (1988). Contaminated Communities: Coping With Residential Toxic Exposure, Second Edition.
[44] Müller, M., & Braun, C. (2021). Guiding or Following the Crowd? Strategic Communication as Reputational and Regulatory Strategy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. https://doi.org/10.1093/JOPART/MUAB008.
[45] Rimkutė, D. (2020). Strategic silence or regulatory talk? Regulatory agency responses to public allegations amidst the glyphosate controversy. Journal of European Public Policy, 27, 1636 - 1656. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1817130.
[46] Buchman, L., Goldsmith, C., Heitman, E., Kang, K., & Liu, X. (2024). Public trust in regulatory agencies and support for policies on agricultural gene drive. Review of Policy Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12610.
[47] Rochyadi-Reetz, M., & Wolling, J. (2022). Between Impact, Politics, and Action: Frames of Climate Change in Indonesian Print and Online Media. Environmental Communication, 16, 942 - 959. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2022.2134170.
[48] Cheredniakova, A., Lobodenko, L., Astashova, J., Zagoskin, E., & Tezina, E. (2025). The Eye-Tracking Analysis of Framing Effects in the Regional Environmental Agenda through Mass Media and Social Media Communication Strategies. 2025 Communication Strategies in Digital Society Seminar (ComSDS), 231-236. https://doi.org/10.1109/ComSDS65569.2025.10971309.
[49] Park, S., & Jung, J. (2023). The interplay between social media virality metrics and message framing in influence perception of pro-environmental messages and behavioral intentions. Telematics Informatics, 78, 101947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2023.101947.
[50] Luxon, E. (2019). Mobilizing environmental sentiment through the media. Environmental Politics, 28, 639 - 662. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1560743.
[51] Paek, H., & Hove, T. (2024). Message framing and trust as moderated mediating mechanisms for effective government response to uncertain risk messages. Journal of Risk Research, 27, 124 - 137. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2024.2311410.
[52] Choi, S., Zhang, J., & Jin, Y. (2023). The effects of threat type and gain–loss framing on publics’ responses to strategic environmental risk communication. Corporate Communications: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/ccij-09-2022-0109.
[53] Paek, H., & Hove, T. (2024). Message framing and trust as moderated mediating mechanisms for effective government response to uncertain risk messages. Journal of Risk Research, 27, 124 - 137. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2024.2311410.
[54] Braun, D., & Hutter, S. (2016). Political trust, extra-representational participation and the openness of political systems. International Political Science Review, 37, 151 - 165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512114559108.
[55] Patterson, J., & Beunen, R. (2019). Institutional work in environmental governance. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62, 1 - 11. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2018.1538328.
[56] Kostetska, K., Khumarova, N., Umanska, Y., Shmygol, N., & Koval, V. (2020). Institutional Qualities of Inclusive Environmental Management in Sustainable Economic Development. Management Systems in Production Engineering, 28, 15 - 22. https://doi.org/10.2478/mspe-2020-0003.
[57] Cox, R. (2007). Nature's “Crisis Disciplines”: Does Environmental Communication Have an Ethical Duty? Environmental Communication, 1, 20 - 5. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524030701333948.
[58] Gallardo, L., Vallés, M., Cativiela-Campos, B., Domingo-Valero, L., Barrasa, A., Alique, M., & López-Granero, C. (2025). Psychological repercussions of PM air pollution in human aging: a comprehensive review of urban and rural environments. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2025.1517090.
[59] Edelstein, M. (1988). Contaminated Communities: Coping With Residential Toxic Exposure, Second Edition.
[60] Schmitt, H., Sullivan, D., Goad, A., & Palitsky, R. (2022). Coping with chronic environmental contamination: Exploring the role of social capital. Journal of Environmental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101870.
[61] Zhuang, J., Cox, J., Cruz, S., Dearing, J. W., Hamm, J. A., & Upham, B. (2016). Environmental stigma: Resident responses to living in a contaminated area. American Behavioral Scientist, 60(11), 1322–1341. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764216657381.
[62] Messer, C., Adams, A., & Shriver, T. (2019). Living with chronic contamination: a comparative analysis of divergent psychosocial impacts. Natural Hazards, 99, 895 - 911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03781-3.
[63] Mrkva, K., Cole, J., & Van Boven, L. (2020). Attention increases environmental risk perception.. Journal of experimental psychology. General. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000772.
[64] Barbo, N., Stoiber, T., Naidenko, O., & Andrews, D. (2022). Locally caught freshwater fish across the United States are likely a significant source of exposure to PFOS and other perfluorinated compounds. Environmental research, 115165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.115165.
[65] Sales, R., Sousa, A., Yáñez, E., Cano, L., Raffin, D., Jatar, L., Astrada, E., Rubio, M., Aguilera, P., Quintana, R., & Rescia, A. (2023). Degree of importance of demographic and socio-cultural factors in environmental perception: bases for the design of public policies in Argentina and Spain. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03079-2.
[66] Moses, A., Mclain, J., Kilungo, A., Root, R., Abrell, L., Buxner, S., Sandoval, F., Foley, T., Jones, M., & Ramírez-Andreotta, M. (2022). Minding the gap: socio-demographic factors linked to the perception of environmental pollution, water harvesting infrastructure, and gardening characteristics. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 12, 594 - 610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-022-00769-7.
[67] Dlamini, S., Tesfamichael, S., Shiferaw, Y., & Mokhele, T. (2020). Determinants of Environmental Perceptions and Attitudes in a Socio-Demographically Diverse Urban Setup: The Case of Gauteng Province, South Africa. Sustainability, 12, 3613. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093613.
[68] Maione, M., Mocca, E., Eisfeld, K., & others. (2021). Public perception of air pollution sources across Europe. Ambio, 50, 1150–1158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01450-5.
[69] Ngwenya, S., Mashau, N. S., Mudau, A. G., Mhlongo, S. E., & Traoré, A. N. (2024). Community perceptions on health risks associated with toxic chemical pollutants in Kwekwe City, Zimbabwe: A qualitative study. Environmental Health Insights, 18. https://doi.org/10.1177/11786302241260487.
[70] Zhang, D., Yu, Y., & Guo, W. (2024). When do individuals take action to protect the environment?——Exploring the Mediating Effects of Negative Impacts of Environmental Risk. Journal of Environmental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102472.
[71] Lan, L., Huang, T., Du, Y., & Bao, C. (2023). Exploring mechanisms affecting environmental risk coping behaviors: evidence from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-31221-0.
[72] Hovick, S., Bigsby, E., Wilson, S., & Thomas, S. (2020). Information Seeking Behaviors and Intentions in Response to Environmental Health Risk Messages: A Test of A Reduced Risk Information Seeking Model. Health Communication, 36, 1889 - 1897. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1804139.
[73] Maartensson, H., & Loi, N. (2021). Exploring the relationships between risk perception, behavioural willingness, and constructive hope in pro-environmental behaviour. Environmental Education Research, 28, 600 - 613. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2021.2015295.
[74] Zeng, J., Jiang, M., & Yuan, M. (2020). Environmental Risk Perception, Risk Culture, and Pro-Environmental Behavior. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051750.
[75] Weir, D., McQuillan, D., & Francis, R. (2019). Civilian science: the potential of participatory environmental monitoring in areas affected by armed conflicts. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7773-9.
[76] Vasiliades, M., Hadjichambis, A., Paraskeva-Hadjichambi, D., Adamou, A., & Georgiou, Y. (2021). A Systematic Literature Review on the Participation Aspects of Environmental and Nature-Based Citizen Science Initiatives. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13137457.
[77] Ghazali, A., Tjakraatmadja, J., , S., & Pratiwi, E. (2021). Resident-based learning model for sustainable resident participation in municipal solid waste management program. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 7, 599-624. https://doi.org/10.22034/GJESM.2021.04.08.
[78] Sîrbu, A., Becker, M., Caminiti, S., De Baets, B., Elen, B., Francis, L., ... & Van den Bossche, J. (2015). Participatory patterns in an international air quality monitoring initiative. PLOS ONE, 10(8), e0136763. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136763.
[79] Robinson, D., Delany, J., & Sugden, H. (2024). Beyond Science: Exploring the Value of Co-created Citizen Science for Diverse Community Groups. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.682.